JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 20, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Lopez Quiroz Alexander·Respondent --

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Se confirma rechazo por cuanto la Corte carece de competencia para conocer de la demanda de inconstitucionalidad presentada
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que rechazó, por incompetencia, la demanda de inconstitucionalidad presentada contra las sentencias SU.388/05, SU.389/05 y T-726/05.

La Sala Plena recordó que la competencia de la Corte Constitucional se encuentra limitada a los actos expresamente señalados en disposición constitucional, sin que se incluya competencia alguna referida a controlar, por vía de la acción de inconstitucionalidad, las sentencias de tutela proferidas por la misma Corporación.

Con base en lo anterior, se confirma el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. CONFIRMAR el auto del 18 de julio de 2008, que dispuso rechazar la demanda presentada por la ciudadana Ofelia Hernandez Rodriguez contra las sentencias SU.388 de 2005, SU.389 de 2005 y T-726 de 2005, por falta de competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.